View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Maintenance & Sustainment Conference & Report Research Protection & Prevention Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 High Voltage FAR Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 AS4373 Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive backshell batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connector selection connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV system ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning liquid nitrogen lunar maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

What do advanced arc fault circuit protection devices protect?

Protection & Prevention

The use of circuit protection devices is a fundamental part of circuit design; it is difficult to think of systems without them. For the aircraft industry, thermal circuit protection devices have been the primary circuit protection components for decades, and there is good reason for this: flight crew and maintenance personnel are familiar with their operation and they are reliable and relatively low cost.

With that said, there are areas that can be improved upon with advanced devices. In a previous article, the pros and cons of using various aircraft circuit protection devices was discussed. This article goes into more depth with the understanding of the Arc Fault Circuit Breakers (AFCBs) as protective devices, whether as individual components or integrated as part of a power system. The understanding and use of these components is a critical part of moving the industry forward. How these devices work and how they can be implemented in an aircraft design is the next step to improving system design.

What are AFCBs?

In particular, the AFCBs work by one of two methods:

  1. they respond to the voltage change on the system, or
  2. they evaluate the frequency signal on the line.
arc fault circuit protection
Example electrical arcing waveform.

In the example shown to the right, there is an arcing waveform. The first three half cycles show a steady state for the system and no electrical arcing. After 1.4 milliseconds, an arc fault is introduced to the system. This is a typical single-phase electrical arc signature. The arc has a steady voltage during the event, then turns off as the voltage decreases. After 15ms, the voltage has increased to a sufficiently high level that the arc re-ignites. The cycle continues until circuit protection opens and/or the separation between the electrodes is too great.

The goal of AFCBs is to significantly reduce the duration of the event. The AS5692 standard requires that the circuit be opened within 8 half-cycles of event initiation. With a quick calculation, this means about 100J of energy with a 20AWG arcing wire. For those that are looking to protect critical systems such as required by regulation 25.981 (fuel tank), you need to ask the question: is this energy sufficiently low enough to prevent damage to my system?

What are some tests that must be performed on AC circuit protection?

As with any electrical device, the specification that covers the performance of the device includes a variety of tests. For the AFCBs, in addition to the standard circuit breaker testing that is performed on the AFCBs (dielectric testing, vibration endurance), there is a number of tests that are particular to AFCB testing. There are several unique test methods and we will go over a couple of them below.

Among the unique tests for the AFCB performance is ensuring that these devices activate in response to an electrical arcing event. As discussed above, there are requirements for how quickly the device must respond. For parallel arcing, the assessment is covered in testing that closely mirrors the AS4373 Wet/Dry arc track resistance test configuration.

Beyond this, there are other tests that must be performed to determine product performance. One such test examines the ability of the circuit protection device to detect series arcing (see Lectromec’s The Impact of Series Arcing article on the dangers of series arcing). In this test, several wires are connected through a terminal strip mounted on a shaker table. The terminal strip is configured such that the terminal is loose and free to shake in order to allow for the electrical connection to be broken. If the circuit protection device is able to detect the series arcing, then the test is halted. If the arcing is not detected, the test is terminated after a defined time period.

The last assessment discussed here for the arc fault circuit protection devices is the potential for cross-talk between circuits. This assessment method seeks to determine if an arc fault in circuit A will cause the activation of the AFCB protecting circuit B. The concern with cross-talk activation is that, if there is a single arc fault detected, it does not remove power to several aircraft systems.

Application

Are AFCBs the answer for every application? No, but there are significant advantages to using some of these advanced technologies (watch the video in the Aircraft Wire Degradation and Looking in the Arc article).

If you are looking for the testing of an arc fault circuit breaker or a similar technology, contact Lectromec to find out more about our testing capabilities.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.