View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Maintenance & Sustainment Conference & Report Research Protection & Prevention Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 High Voltage FAR Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 AS4373 Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive backshell batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connector selection connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV system ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning liquid nitrogen lunar maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

What is the cost of arc track resistance testing?

Arcing Testing & Assessment

Arc track resistance testing is an important topic that is of interest to many in the aerospace industry. In this article we discuss the test itself, common test types, the process, and the price of the test performance.

Test methods

Among the most common test methods for arc track resistance testing are: the AS4373, MIL-STD-2223, and EN3475. There are other test methods, but they are typically proprietary test methods, such as the Boeing BMS standard. Within each of these standards there are both wet arc track resistance tests and dry arc track resistance tests. Among these standards, there are slight differences in the setup, circuit configuration, and termination conditions.

Deciding which method to use is more often driven by the end client or market. The AS4373 test method is a common test method for US military and commercial customers. The MIL-STD-2223 is applicable only to legacy systems as this test method has been superseded by the AS4373 test method.

The EN3475 method is common for the European market, and probably could be considered to be the most severe test of those presented here. That is because, unlike the other test methods discussed, the EN method has more power wires in the test sample harness.

Test Performance

aircraft wire
Careful control of the arc track resistance test parameters ensures accurate, consistent results. Contact Lectromec to find out more about the testing services offered.

For each of these tests there is a common set of steps:

  1. Visually inspect received wire: This is done to find any obvious defects in the wire and wire insulation. The most common cause for defects is damage during shipping.
  2. Perform wet dielectric test: The wire used in the arc track resistance test is submerged in a bath and subjected to a 2.5kV dielectric test. The objective is to identify any defects in the wire insulation and remove any segments that have insulation breaches. This is an important step in that it removes the chance of falsely identifying wire damage for electrical arcing.
  3. Sample preparation: The wires are cut, stripped, and assembled into 7-wire harnesses. The particular lengths and configurations are identified in each specification. The wires are then bound together with lacing tape.
  4. Test performance: Once the harnesses are prepared, they are installed in Lectromec’s arc track resistance test system (Lectromec currently has the capability of testing three harnesses simultaneously). Depending on the particular test type, this may take as long as a week to complete. To understand where the variability in tests may come from, read Lectromec’s Understanding Unexpected Arc Track Resistance Test Results article.
  5. Posttest assessment: After the testing is performed, the length of the damage to each wire is measured and the number of passive wires damaged during the test is assessed via a wet dielectric test to 1.5kV. (Read our What do the Results of Arc Track Resistance Testing Mean? article for a discussion on the meaning arc track resistance test results.)

Reduced testing and cost for R&D

We offer a couple of options, which can be of particular interest to those looking to reduce costs and/or get a basic understanding of their materials performance.

As mentioned earlier, most of the arc track resistance tests require multiple trials performed at given circuit resistance values (e.g. the 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 Ohms). While it is ideal that all of these tests are performed, it is possible to gain some insight into the wire performance without a full battery of tests. A reduced sample set of one or two trials per circuit resistance value can help to direct the R&D down a more viable development path.

Pricing

At this time, the pricing for arc track resistance testing is as follows:

  • Full battery of 15 dry arc track resistance tests (AS4373) – $3,200
  • Full battery of 15 wet arc track resistance tests (AS4373) – $4,000
  • R&D reduced testing of dry arc track resistance tests – $1,200
  • R&D reduced testing of wet arc track resistance tests – $1,700

Custom testing needs and changes to the test parameters (e.g. different resistance values, wire gauges, voltage, etc.) will be addressed on a case by case basis and may affect the test price. Contact Lectromec to find get a quote.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.