View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Standard & Regulation Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Management Conference & Report Research Miscellaneous Arcing
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection High Voltage AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) AS4373 Maintenance FAR 25.1707 Degradation Wire System
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 AC 43 Accelerated Aging accessibility ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude Aluminum arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Resistance Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS29606 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS6324 AS81824 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM B230 ASTM B355 ASTM B470 ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D495 ASTM D8355 ASTM D876 ASTM F2639 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive Avionics backshell batteries bend radius Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification cfr 25.1717 Chafing characteristic impedance Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection cleaning clearance Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Completed Harness Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Conductor Testing conductors conduit Connector Connector Durability Connector Failure Modes connector installation Connector rating connector selection connector testing connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) corrosion prevention Cracking creepage D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR electric aircraft Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electrified Vehicles Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) Electrostatic Discharge EMC EMF EMI EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 Fault fault tree Filter Line Cable Firewall Fixturing Flame Resistance Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Fluid Immersion Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Fuse Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook harness construction Harness Design harness installation harness protection hazard Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage High Voltage Degradation High Voltage Systems HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV connector HV system ICAs IEC 60851 IEC60172 IEEE immersion impedance insertion loss Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 6722 ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning lightning protection liquid nitrogen lithium battery lunar Magnet wire maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-F-5372 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-7928/5 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyamide polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Preventative Maintenance Program Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through quadrax Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee SAE J1127 SAE J1128 Sanitizing Fluids Scrape Abrasion Secondary Harness Protection separation separation distance Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal signal cable signal reflection Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy superconductor supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance volume resistivity vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Winding wire Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

Cable Impedance in EWIS Applications

Testing & Assessment

Key Takeaways
  • Impedance is the measure of opposition to alternating current (AC) in a circuit.
  • Characteristic impedance is defined as the ratio of the voltage to the current of a single wave propagating along a cable, with no reflections present
  • When the impedance is not controlled or there is an impedance mismatch at the terminations, part of the signal is reflected.

Energy transmitted down a wire will progressively lose energy. In low frequency applications, we call it “voltage drop” or “ohmic heating”, and for high frequency applications, we call it “attenuation”. For short lengths of wire/cable, the impacts of signal attenuations are often minimal, but as EWIS designers seek to optimize systems (particularly for weight), efforts are made to balance the system performance requirements with weight savings from utilizing small gauge conductors. In this article, we discuss the factors impacting cable impedance, its impact on attenuation, and useful factors for selecting the right EWIS components for the application.

Background

Impedance is the measure of opposition to alternating current (AC) in a circuit, combining the effects of a component’s resistance, capacitance, and inductance. Every cable and interconnect/termination in a circuit presents some impedance, and understanding this impedance is critical for electrical systems. In the context of aircraft Electrical Wiring Interconnect Systems (EWIS), cable impedance is a key parameter that affects how signals and power are transmitted through wiring harnesses. A cable’s impedance influences the voltage and current distribution along its length, and whether signals are cleanly delivered or distorted by reflections. In high-frequency or fast-rise-time applications (e.g., Pulse Width Modulated Power), cables behave as transmission lines with a characteristic impedance. If the cable’s impedance is not compatible with the source or load (e.g., a cable’s impedance is 50 Ohms and the load’s impedance is 100 Ohms), a portion of the signal can be reflected, leading to reduced delivered voltage or interference with the original signal. This is why those selecting cables for EWIS applications must pay close attention to impedance to ensure signal integrity and power transfer efficiency.

The cable impedance’s significance can be demonstrated with a simple scenario: When a signal source drives a cable and load, the source voltage is divided between the source’s internal impedance, the cable, and the load and depends on the impedance values of the components. For maximum power transfer and predictable signal voltage, these impedances should be matched. If the ‘transmission line” and load impedance are mismatched, the voltage on the load may be lower than expected and/or can oscillate due to reflections. In extreme cases (such as high-power RF transmission), impedance mismatches create standing wave patterns with voltage peaks that risk damaging the cable insulation (a particular concern for high voltage systems).

Characteristic Impedance

While impedance in general refers to AC opposition in any component, characteristic impedance (often denoted \(Z_{0}\)) refers specifically to the impedance of a uniform cable or transmission line. It is defined as the ratio of the voltage to the current of a single wave propagating along the line, with no reflections present (idealized model). Equivalently, it is the input impedance of an infinitely long line, and for any finite line it is the impedance seen at the input when the line is terminated in \(Z_{0}\) itself (consideration of S-parameters further breaks down these factors). This parameter is determined entirely by the cable’s geometry and materials (conductors and dielectric) and is independent of the line’s length.

Mathematically, the characteristic impedance is given by:

\(Z_{0}=\sqrt{\frac{R+jwL}{G+jwC}}\)

where

  • \(R\) is the per-unit-length resistance,
  • \(L\) is the per-unit-length inductance,
  • \(G\) is the per-unit-length conductance of the dielectric,
  • \(C\) is the per-unit-length capacitance of the cable, and
  • \(ω\) is the angular frequency of the signal.

For most practical cables at typical operating frequencies, the loss components \(R\) and \(G\) are relatively small. In a low-loss cable (or at high frequencies where reactive terms dominate), the expression simplifies and the characteristic impedance is approximately the constant value:

\(Z_{0}\approx \sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}\)

Frequency Independent

In other words, a cable with fixed inductance and capacitance per unit length has an essentially frequency-independent characteristic impedance, and energy from a source will propagate down the cable without being dissipated in the cable; reflections at terminations or splices are considered separately. For example, a typical coaxial cable might have \(L\) and \(C\) chosen such that \(Z_{0}\) is 50 Ω, which remains roughly constant over a wide frequency range.

It is important to note that \(Z_{0}\) being frequency-independent is an idealized model. In the so-called “RC region” where inductive effects are negligible and resistive and capacitive effects dominate, the effective impedance can become frequency-dependent (e.g. approximately \(Z_{0}\approx \sqrt{\frac{R}{j\omega C’}}\), which decreases with frequency). Fortunately, in most EWIS applications, cables operate in a regime where \(Z_{0}\) can be treated as a constant for signal integrity purposes. The key point for engineers is that each cable type has a characteristic impedance determined by its construction – and matching that impedance in the system is vital for optimal performance.

Incident, reflected, and transmitted signal.

When the impedance is not controlled or there is an impedance mismatch at the terminations, part of the signal is reflected. To help quantify the importance of impedance matching, the voltage reflection coefficient (\(Γ\)) at the load is defined as the ratio of the reflected voltage wave to the incident (forward) voltage wave at the interface. For a transmission line with characteristic impedance \(Z_{0}\) terminated by a load with impedance \(Z_{L}\), \(Γ\) is given by:

\(\Gamma = \frac{Z_{L}-Z_{0}}{Z_{L}+Z_{0}}\)

In the case of a 50 Ω line and source driving a 100 Ω load, \(Γ\) would yield 33%. In practical terms, if the incident signal has a peak voltage of 1V, the reflected signal will have an amplitude of 0.33V. If the equipment is sensitive to signal disruptions, such a high reflection could impact device performance.

Conclusion

For those that took a graduate level E&M course, the description of waveguides was abstracted to the point where it was almost impossible to understand a real-world application. Thankfully, the theoretical implications of cable impedance have been distilled to be accessible to engineers seeking to pick the right components for their applications. A cable’s impedance is measurable property that may change based on the physical installation and environmental operating conditions (not to mention potential impact of material aging). These will be further assessed in future Lectromec articles. For those seeking support assessing cables for current or upcoming projects, contact Lectromec; our ISO 17025:2017 accredited EWIS test lab is ready to help.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than two decades. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification and the former chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee.