Testing & Assessment

Understanding Coaxial Cables

The development and use of coaxial cables have come a long way since its invention in 1880. Improvements in design and reliability have made it a frequent feature for aircraft data transmission applications. In the realm of aerospace, a common coaxial specification is the MIL-DTL-17 coaxial cable standard.

There are several parts to the MIL-DTL-17 (currently at revision H) standard of which application engineers and EWIS designers should be aware. Certainly, the requirements of coaxial cables have evolved as the needs of airborne applications have changed (the military Assist website only have revisions dating back to 1983, and this is revision F). This article provides information on what the cables in this standard are, and characteristics that you should be aware of when selecting or maintaining these cables.

Overview

coaxial cable breakdown
Example coaxial cable.

The MIL-DTL-17 standard covers signal cables specifically designed for “low-loss, stable operation from the relatively low frequencies through the higher frequencies in the microwave and radar regions of the frequency spectrum.” (note: for those unfamiliar with cable specifications, there is typically a based standard, such as MIL-DTL-17, that contains general information, then there are ‘slash sheets’, which are specific cable constructions that fall into the generalized category of the base standard). Specifications, such as the MIL-C-17/185C, are recommended for use up to 1GHz. Whatever the particular use might be, the typical construction of the coaxial cable is the following:

Shielding

As discussed earlier, the primary reason for these cables is for signal transmission. This might be for data between devices in the aircraft or for signal antennas. Either way, proper shielding of the cables ensures good system performance. Past Lectromec articles on shielding for cables have covered the different types of shielding and the potential impacts of EMI.

Flammability

An interesting item about the MIL-DTL-17 cables is that flammability, while it has been in the standard for several iterations, has not always been a requirement of the standard until now. Several of the coaxial cables in the standard, such as MIL-C-17/77 and MIL-C-17/78 do not have flammability requirement (note: these are now inactive standards, but they can still be found on aircraft). For those using these cables, it is advised to consider the risk associated with these cables and determine if a replacement is necessary at the next opportunity.

The flammability test that is called out for in the MIL-DTL-17 is the same 60o burn test as identified in other standards (more can be read here).

Impedance Matching

One item to note with these cables is that, as with any signal cable, impedance matching is very important. For those unfamiliar with impedance matching, anytime there is a break in the circuit, such as at connection devices, the impedance of the mating, if not done properly, can have a significant impact on the signal strength. Slight impedance changes can dissipate the signal energy or reflect it and reduce the overall signal strength to the target device. Identification of these circuit interrupts can be done with Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) technologies.

This long aside has been made for the purpose of highlighting the importance of selecting cables that match the impedance of the application and not using just whatever is convenient or cheaper. Not all cables are the same and care should be taken when evaluating which cable to use for aircraft design.

Verification Tests

As with any aerospace cable, there are a lot of qualification and verification tests necessary for acceptance and many of these tests are the same as the standard single conductor wires. The following is a brief list of common qualification tests performed on coaxial cables:

Application Notes

When using these materials, there are several limitations:

Summary

Michael Traskos
Michael Traskos
President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.