View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Standard & Regulation Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment Management Conference & Report Protection & Prevention Research Miscellaneous Arcing
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection High Voltage AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS4373 Maintenance Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 AC 43 Accelerated Aging accessibility ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS29606 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS6324 AS81824 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM B355 ASTM B470 ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM D876 ASTM F2639 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive Avionics backshell batteries bend radius Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification cfr 25.1717 Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection cleaning clearance Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Conductor Testing conductors conduit Connector Connector rating connector selection connector testing connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) corrosion prevention Cracking creepage D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR electric aircraft Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electrified Vehicles Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) Electrostatic Discharge EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 Fault fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Fluid Immersion Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Fuse Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design harness protection hazard Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage High Voltage Degradation HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV connector HV system ICAs IEC 60851 IEC60172 IEEE immersion insertion loss Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning lightning protection liquid nitrogen lithium battery lunar Magnet wire maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-7928/5 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyamide polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Preventative Maintenance Program Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection separation Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy superconductor supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance volume resistivity vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Winding wire Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code
Key Takeaways
  • Just as with any other component of an aircraft wiring system, heat shrink tubing must withstand extensive severe testing before being approved for use.
  • One of two shrinkage methods is employed prior to most heat shrink testing in order to obtain results representative of heat shrink in application.
  • The SAE AS23053 and ASTM D2671 standards together compose a thorough testing guide for heat shrink tubing on aircraft.

In a recent article Lectromec discussed the flammability tests used to evaluate heat shrink tubing. Here we will provide a more general discussion of heat shrink tubing tests, particularly regarding the SAE AS23053.


A commonly used testing standard for Heat Shrink Tubing for aerospace applications is the SAE AS23053 (currently in Revision A, most recently revised in 2019). The testing standard is very broad and covers “various types and colors of electrical insulating sleeving that will shrink to a predetermined size upon the application of heat.” Specified properties and requirements for tubing of particular materials can be found in associated AS23053/XX specification standards.

The AS23053 standard covers the following classifications of inspection:

  • Initial qualification inspection
  • Retention of qualification inspection – every 36 months after the initial qualification date. The current retention status of AS23053 suppliers can be found under the “QPL-SIS” tab here
  • Quality conformance inspections

This discussion will also briefly address the ASTM D2671 “Standard Test Methods for Heat-Shrinkable Tubing for Electrical use”, as it is frequently referenced and applied in the SAE AS23053.

In 2001, the US military standard for heat shrink tubing (MIL-DTL-23053E) after it, and many other standards, were taken on by the SAE. The MIL-DTL-23053 is now superseded by the SAE AS23053.


 Restricted Shrinkage 1
Mandrel for restricted shrinkage. (From MIL-DTL-23053 Rev E)

As with any component intended for use on aircraft, heat shrink tubing test standards are rather extensive and aim to thoroughly verify the component’s quality. Not every test method will be addressed in this article, but some of the more interesting ones are highlighted.

Restricted vs Unrestricted Shrinkage

Two methods are employed for shrinking heat shrink tubing for testing: restricted shrinkage and unrestricted shrinkage. Both methods achieve a similar goal – to shrink the tubing prior to testing, their methodologies, however, differ critically.

 Restricted Shrinkage 2
3D visualization of the restricted shrinkage mandrel.

Restricted Shrinkage is performed on a conductive metallic mandrel with the intention of using the mandrel as a representative internal conductor for voltage withstand testing after the shrinkage. The shape of the mandrel is shown in the accompanying images.

Unrestricted shrinkage may be performed with the specimen resting on an oven tray or supported by a mandrel whose diameter matches that of the maximum acceptable sleeving inner diameter size.

Nearly all testing is performed on tubing after undergoing “Unrestricted Shrinkage”. This ensures that the data collected from testing accurately represent the capabilities of the tubing in application.

The following properties are tested after unrestricted shrinkage as part of the unrestricted shrinkage evaluation

  • Color
  • Color stability
  • Clarity stability
  • Specific gravity
  • Dielectric constant
  • Fungus resistance
  • Tensile strength
  • Ultimate Elongation
  • Dielectric strength
  • Volume resistivity
  • Low temperature flexibility
  • Corrosion
  • Heat resistance
  • Water absorption
  • Flammability
  • Fluid resistance
  • Sealing efficiency

The following properties are tested after unrestricted shrinkage but are not implicitly part of the unrestricted shrinkage evaluation

  • Dimensional measurements
  • Cold impact

Very few tests are performed on the heat shrink tubing as it is provided by the supplier: dimensional measurements, heat shock, secant modulus, and restricted shrinkage.

Fluid Resistance

Heat shrink tubing specimens are tested to evaluate their resistance to damage or degradation caused by commonly present aerospace fluids. The standard test fluids are as follows:

Conforming to
Hydraulic fluid, petroleum base MIL-PRF-5606
JP-8 MIL-DTL-83133
Lubricating oil MIL-PRF-7808
Lubricating oil MIL-PRF-23699
5% NaCl A-A-694
Deicing Fluid AMS 1424

Virgin specimens are exposed to one test fluid for 24 hours and then evaluated for tensile strength, ultimate elongation, and dielectric strength. Heat shrink materials must be capable of maintaining their properties after exposure to common aerospace fluids to ensure any level of confidence in the component.

Heat Shock

Heat shock is one of the few heat shrink tests that is performed without any pre-shrinking procedure. Testing consists of a 4-hour oven exposure with the specimen hanging vertically inside the heat chamber/oven. Throughout the elevated temperature exposure, and after the exposure is completed, the specimen is visually monitored for any evidence of cracking, flowing, or dripping; observation of any of these defects is cause for test failure. In the case that the specimen does not show evidence of these defects, it is removed from the oven, returned to ambient conditions, and evaluated via a 360o bend test around an appropriately sized steel mandrel. A final visual examination is then performed to check for any specimen damage.


Heat shrink tubing is a very commonly used component in Electrical Wiring Integration Systems (EWIS). Just as with any other component of an aircraft wiring system, heat shrink tubing must withstand extensive severe testing before being approved for use. How these products will evolve with the next generation of aircraft wiring systems is uncertain. Areas that could use new heat shrink tubing products include higher temperature ratings as the maximum rated temperature of the existing heat shrink is about 200oC. Similar to other parts of the EWIS, heat shrink may need to evolve to address the needs of high voltage systems, but this remains to be seen.

If you’re looking for qualification testing for your heat shrink tubing product, or for guidance on which heat shrink material is right for your system contact Lectromec today! Our ISO 17025:2017 accredited lab is here to help.

Laura Wishart

Laura Wishart

Engineer, Lectromec

Laura has been with Lectromec since 2019 and has been a key contributor to projects involving testing of EWIS/fuel system failure modes, the impact of poor installation practices on EWIS longevity, and wire/cable certification testing. Her knowledge and attention to detail ensure consistent delivery of accurate test results from Lectromec’s lab.