View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Standard & Regulation Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment Management Conference & Report Protection & Prevention Research Miscellaneous Arcing
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection High Voltage AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS4373 Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Maintenance FAR 25.1707 Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 AC 43 Accelerated Aging accessibility ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS29606 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS6324 AS81824 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM B355 ASTM B470 ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM D876 ASTM F2639 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive Avionics backshell batteries bend radius Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification cfr 25.1717 Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection cleaning clearance Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Conductor Testing conductors conduit Connector connector installation Connector rating connector selection connector testing connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) corrosion prevention Cracking creepage D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR electric aircraft Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electrified Vehicles Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) Electrostatic Discharge EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 Fault fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Fluid Immersion Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Fuse Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design harness protection hazard Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage High Voltage Degradation HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV connector HV system ICAs IEC 60851 IEC60172 IEEE immersion insertion loss Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning lightning protection liquid nitrogen lithium battery lunar Magnet wire maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-7928/5 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyamide polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Preventative Maintenance Program Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection separation separation distance Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy superconductor supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance volume resistivity vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Winding wire Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

Aircraft wire abrasion resistance


The proper installation of wiring will dramatically reduce unnecessary stresses and result in an uneventful service life. In the real world, wires rub against various airplane components and can create unsafe conditions from both physical and functional viewpoints. Because of this, materials must be selected that can endure mechanical stresses and not pose a hazard to an aircraft’s airworthiness.

There are several considerations that go into determining the abrasion resistance tolerance necessary for an application. Both the materials and the processing of wires/cables have an impact on abrasion resistance. In the blog Assessment of Mechanical Stress on Wire Insulation, published two weeks ago, Lectromec reviewed the cut-through test methods. Here we look at abrasion test methods and how the results can help you to understand the service life of airplane components.

Scrape Abrasion

aircraft wire abrasion resistance
Depiction of a wire abrasion resistance test

The scrape abrasion test is a common test used in wire qualification. In this test method, a sample wire/cable is placed under a ‘sharp’ edge (see figure for configuration). The edge then slowly moves back and forth across the surface of the wire. Once an electrical connection is made between the cutting edge and the wire, the test is completed.

In Service Consideration

With any test, it is necessary to also consider what the test results mean from an application perspective. Wires and cables should be routed in such a way that there is positive separation between the harness and the potential chafing locations (e.g. edges of equipment, structure, hydraulic lines, and flight control cables). Even with design guidance and best practices, abrasion still happens. Clamps break, mountings come loose, equipment is not stored correctly – there are dozens of reasons why abrasion may take place. If a harness comes in contact with another object in an aircraft application, factors such as harness weight, contact location (flat surface or edge), and vibration/sway frequency will impact the actual time to failure on airplane. As such, the results of abrasion testing should only give confidence in comparative endurance of wires, not the time to failure.

Cable to Cable Abrasion

aircraft wire abrasion resistance
Example of cable to cable abrasion test

In the cable to cable abrasion test, two cables are placed in tight contact with one another and a lateral motion is applied to cause abrasion between the samples. Depending on the particular specification and customer need, this test may include a requirement of over one million cycles. At the typical testing frequency, this means that the test would run for at least 25 hours.

An example of the test is shown in the figure above. The contact location of the wires/cables is created so that there is good contact across an inch of the samples. The end of the test condition occurs when the conductors of each wire make contact.

In aircraft comparison

The scenario considered for this setup is the wire-to-wire endurance and the interaction between a wire and another wire of the same type in a harness if different tensions are placed on the wires. This scenario also considers poor routing where one harness rests upon another.

Similar to many other tests that are performed as part of wire certification, this test does not provide a clear basis for in-aircraft life, but it does give information on a couple of areas:

  • The wire insulation stiffness. Insulations that have higher friction coefficients are likely to abrade through each other more quickly (though these may be easier to handle).
  • Performance of seamless topcoats. One of the more recent developments for wire constructions has been to create wires and cables without a noticeable seam. These seamless constructions have been found to reduce damage during harness fabrication and installation. Those wires/cables with seamless topcoats are likely to perform much better than their ‘seamed’ counterparts.
wire abrasion
Depiction of standard construction compared to seamless

FAA Research

In the last decade the FAA funded testing to determine if different wire types in a harness resulted in reduced service life. For example, polyimide insulation is a hard material and may damage other insulations such as PTFE (Teflon®)-insulated wires. The examination found that there was no discernable difference in the service life of homogeneous or heterogeneous harness constructions. This information is good news for those who wish to progressively update their airplane wiring.


Abrasion resistance is an important characteristic of wire insulation and those wires with greater abrasion resistance will perform better in-service. The most common tradeoff for the improved physical strength will be wire/cable weight. Though the development of seamless constructions has done a lot to improve abrasion resistance, future improvements will likely affect the material types. Some designer may find an acceptable alternative in using ‘weaker’ insulations on the wire/cable and supplement it with additional sleeving materials. Although this may result in a weight increase, it may also reduce the overall harness diameter. There are many tradeoffs in aerospace system design and abrasion resistance is just one more to consider.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.