View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Maintenance & Sustainment Conference & Report Research Protection & Prevention Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 High Voltage FAR Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 AS4373 Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive backshell batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connector selection connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV system ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning liquid nitrogen lunar maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

7-step process for aircraft wire size and circuit protection selection

Management Protection & Prevention

Sometimes the design guidance that is a couple of decades old is still valid. The following flowchart is from the NASA Technical Memorandum 102179 – 1991.

The chart provides a flow for the design considerations for circuit protection, starting with determining the current need and ending with the implementation of the system. The 7 steps listed below discuss the flowchart in further detail.

aircraft wire size and circuit protection

Step 1: Select type of protection device

This is when one of the following types of protection devices is being chosen: thermal circuit protection, fuse, arc fault protective device, or distributed power control unit. Each has its pros and cons (e.g. fuses have a faster trip time but are only good for a one time use), so it is necessary to understand the particular system’s needs before making a selection.

Step 2: Identify the operational environment

For the space application for which the flowchart was designed, the operational environment also included the consideration of vacuum and zero-g as it could impact the separation distance necessary to break a circuit. For those with a more terrestrial application, operational environment is still an important consideration. If the equipment operates in an uncontrolled environment or is a software controlled system, then its exposure to Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) or elevated temperatures should be considered.

Step 2a: Select the device rating

Without any modifying factors, determine the necessary current for the application. The information from FAA AC 43.13 is presented in the article Implications of Circuit Breakers and Wire Size for Wire Systems. Note that this rating information is based on maximum size circuit protection for a given wire gauge. This will provide a starting point for the wire/circuit protection size selection.

circuit protection
Test Panel

Step 2b: Select adjusted device rating

This adjusted device rating is based on the environmental considerations identified in Step #2. As discussed in the Lectromec Derating Tool Tutorial for EWIS article, the operational altitude impacts the given wire/harness current carrying capabilities.

Step 3: Determine device rating to use

Based on the selections made in 2a and 2b, determine which choice required the broadest operational environmental conditions; this may be a combination of both.

Step 4: Calculate the maximum difference/change in temperature (dT) for the wire

This is slightly mislabeled – it should say the maximum/minimum temperature of the wire/cable. The limiting factor may be the insulation or the conductor. Either way, it is important to know the operational range for the system. This step should also include the assessment of wire support equipment such as splices and connectors.

Step 5: Operational environment/Determine ambient temperature

This step could be combined with step 4, but it includes the evaluation of the zone’s ambient operational temperature. This zonal examination should also cover the nearby systems, equipment, and plumbing to determine if there are heat sources that may impact the wire temperature. The result from this step should be used to determine the current derating (as discussed in AS50881 and in the Lectromec Derating Tool Tutorial for EWIS article).

Step 6: Voltage drop assessment

The separation from the power bus to the powered device impacts the voltage seen by the end equipment. Smaller gauge wires (e.g. 24), have a resistance of 2.5 Ohms/100 ft.

In this step, it is recommended to determine the routed separation distance in the system and determine the voltage drop. Recommendations for determining these can be found in AS50881.

Step 7: Wire gauge increase

Based on the assessment results, it may be necessary to increase the wire gauge to achieve the necessary voltage drop and current carrying requirements of the system. If a new wire gauge/circuit protection pairing is selected, then return to Step #2 and repeat the exercise.

This process may seem overly complicated, but it is necessary to address the proper sizing of both the wire and the corresponding circuit breaker. Undersized wires may act as a heat source and/or reduce the attached device functionality. An oversized circuit protection may not protect the wire interconnection system and many not respond in fault conditions.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components.