View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Maintenance & Sustainment Conference & Report Research Protection & Prevention Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 High Voltage FAR Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 AS4373 Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM D8355 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive backshell batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connector selection connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV system ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning liquid nitrogen lunar maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

Low Temperature Bend Testing for Lunar Applications

Research Testing & Assessment

Key Takeaways
  • Established EWIS test methods for Earth-based applications can be modified and used to inform selection of EWIS components in space applications.
  • Flexibiity of wire and cable under extreme cold temperatures is critical when selecting such components for space applications.
  • Extreme low temperature flexibility of wire and cable are affected by wire size, number of conductors, insulation thickness, and cable type.

There is a plethora of factors to consider when selecting wire/cable for use in any large-scale applications. This is particularly true of space applications as there is limited data for comparative analysis. To fill some of these knowledge gaps, NASA performed several wire/cable tests in 2010; the following is a summary/discussion of the “Wire and Cable Cold Bending Test” portion of this testing. The full test report may be found here.

Though knowledge of specific wire/cable constructions’ performance in space applications is limited, some knowledge gaps may be filled here on earth. Existing industry tests can be modified by applying known information about extraterrestrial environments to provide valuable insight into component performance under such conditions.

Test Performance

One of the key considerations for electrical wiring interconnection system (EWIS) components in this environment is extreme low temperature. NASA sought to evaluate wire and cable flexibility for lunar applications; specifically looking to evaluate the ease of reeling/unreeling wire and cable in lunar environments. Bend testing was performed on 35 different insulated wire and cable constructions at liquid nitrogen temperature to evaluate flexibility in extreme cold conditions. It was the intent of this effort that, “testing at the extreme cold temperature of liquid nitrogen will begin to build a database of what off-the-shelf types of wires and eventually cabling may be applicable to the lunar environment.”

Bend tests were performed on each sample at both room and liquid nitrogen temperatures and the results at each temperature were compared. Wire and cable constructions selected for testing represented a range of gauges and insulations commonly used for space applications.

NASA Cold Bend Setup
Test set up of the NASA cold bend testing.

Conditioning of the test samples took place in a dewar of liquid nitrogen, allowing samples to equilibrate for approximately ten minutes to an approximate temperature of 75 K (~ -200oC). Samples were tested using the equipment shown in the photograph; force exerted on the test sample was constantly recorded throughout each test on the data collection computer. From the recorded data, force vs time graphs were generated for each sample both at room temperature and liquid nitrogen temperature.


The samples covered several wire insulation types. These insulations included:

  • PVC
  • Silicon Rubber
  • PVC with Nylon Cover
  • Teflon (PTFE)
  • Kapton (Polyimide)
  • PEEK

Looking at the test plan, it was unusual for PVC wire to be considered in the assessment as NASA’s own guidance for wire insulation selection guidelines (NASA Parts Selection List (NPSL) – Wire Insulation Selection Guidelines) does not include PVC. The material is typically avoided in aerospace applications and is explicitly prohibited in the AS50881 standard.


As one may expect, each wire’s curve on the force vs time graph shows a sharp increase in force early on in the bend and then flattens out. Also unsurprisingly, samples experienced a significant increase in bending force when conditioned at liquid nitrogen temperature. Interpretation of the data show that wire size, number of conductors, insulation thickness, and cable type were all factors in the sample’s performance.

Of the 35 tested constructions, only six experienced mechanical failure of the insulation in the form of cracking or breaking:

  • Wire 2: Stranded Copper; 10AWG; PVC
  • Wire 5: Stranded Copper; 10 AWG; T80 Nylon or TWN75 FTI Type MTW or THNN or THWN
  • Wire 20: Stranded copper; 6 AWG; PVC with Nylon Cover
  • Wire 21: Stranded copper; 6 AWG; PVC
  • Wire 22: stranded copper; 14 AWG; Pink Rubber like inner insulation with black rubberized jacket
  • Wire 23: stranded copper; 22 AWG; 6 conductor insulated wire with additional un-insulated ground wire. Metal foil inner wrap on the wire and outer plastic jacket; PVC

Insulation thicknesses among these wires ranged from 0.3048 mm (Wire 23) to 1.651 mm (Wire 22). Despite the relative thinness of the insulation on wire 23, the multiple internal conductors had a significant detriment on the sample’s performance. In general, single conductor wires performed better than multi-conductor cables.

NASA Cold Bend Graph
Force vs time graph of 10 AWG test samples. See the full report for complete test results.

The largest wires tested were 6 AWG single conductor wires with PVC insulation. According to the report, the insulation of both of these wires “shattered during bending at liquid nitrogen temperature.” Smaller wires with the same PVC insulation were tested as well, and the majority did not experience failure during the bend at liquid nitrogen temperature. It is notable that the 6-conductor cable sample tested in this effort was constructed of 22 AWG PVC-insulated wires and that the outer jacket of the cable “cracked during bending at liquid nitrogen temperature.”

In general, the data indicated that wire constructions with thicker insulation experienced a far more drastic increase in required bend force than those with thinner insulation layers when comparing between bending force at low temperature to that at room temperature. Wires with the thickest insulation among the tested samples resulted in an increase of bending force 20 to 40 times greater than that at room temperature, while the wire sample with the thinnest insulation layer had an increase in bending force “only on the order of 15%.”

Multi-wire cables similarly showed a larger increase in bend force with an increasing thickness in insulation. An interesting result from the cable tests is that both a standard two-conductor cable and a two-conductor coax cable with the same wire gauge required approximately the same force to bend at room temperature but, at liquid nitrogen temperature, the standard cable experienced a 6x increase in bend force and the coax cable experienced a 27x increase in bend force.


Results from NASA’s testing effort provide valuable information that can be used moving forward in developing EWIS for space applications. Research into wire and cable performance in extraterrestrial conditions may prove to be imperative for the aerospace industry as space travel becomes more common and accessible.

Contact Lectromec today to learn more about how our ISO accredited testing facility can assist your selection of EWIS components for space applications.

Laura Wishart

Laura Wishart

Engineer, Lectromec

Laura has been with Lectromec since 2019 and has been a key contributor on projects involving testing of EWIS/fuel system failure modes, the impact of poor installation practices on EWIS longevity, and wire/cable certification testing. Recent projects include work toward the definition and certification of high-voltage aircraft wiring systems. Laura’s knowledge and attention to detail have ensured consistent delivery of accurate test results from Lectromec’s lab.