View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Standard & Regulation Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Management Conference & Report Research Miscellaneous Arcing
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection High Voltage AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) AS4373 Maintenance FAR 25.1707 Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 AC 43 Accelerated Aging accessibility ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS29606 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS6324 AS81824 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM B355 ASTM B470 ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM D876 ASTM F2639 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive Avionics backshell batteries bend radius Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification cfr 25.1717 Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection cleaning clearance Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Conductor Testing conductors conduit Connector connector installation Connector rating connector selection connector testing connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) corrosion prevention Cracking creepage D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR electric aircraft Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electrified Vehicles Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) Electrostatic Discharge EMC EMF EMI EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 Fault fault tree Filter Line Cable Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Fluid Immersion Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Fuse Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design harness protection hazard Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage High Voltage Degradation HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV connector HV system ICAs IEC 60851 IEC60172 IEEE immersion insertion loss Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning lightning protection liquid nitrogen lithium battery lunar Magnet wire maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-7928/5 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyamide polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Preventative Maintenance Program Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection separation separation distance Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy superconductor supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance volume resistivity vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Winding wire Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code
Key Takeaways
  • Backshells and accessories are a necessary part of wire harness design.
  • In 2004, the FAA funded a study to examine how tightly bound a backshell must be to a connector before there was an impact to the backshell connector resistance.
  • The AS85049 aerospace standard provides various test methods for connector accessories, including backshells.


The backshell of a connector is an item that perhaps does not get the attention that it should. Often the discussion of EWIS focuses on the wiring, the connectors, or managing the risk of EWIS failures, but the connector backshell is ignored. The simple connector backshell (that is anything but simple) is designed for support and protection of wires and cables physically and, in the case of signal cables, support and protect electrically too.

The following is a brief introduction to backshells, their use, associated standards, and research that has been performed to determine what to look for when performing maintenance.


In general, connector backshells fall under the classification as ‘connector accessories’. Backshells are the components that attach to the back of connectors often designed to guide the wires and cables that are terminated at the connector. The backshells are often mated with strain relief components, environmental seals, the shielding. The backshell may be made from metal or molded using a rubber or neoprene covering over the backshell of the connector.

A connector is just one part of a wire harnesses termination. Depending on the wire/cable need, a termination system may include eight or more components. Source MIL-HDBK-522.


Most connectors will have some backshell and accessories, and this should be considered as evidence that backshells and accessories are a necessary part of wire harness design. Perhaps the most common connector backshell/accessory standard for aerospace is the AS85049. The standard is written to address the generalized needs of connector accessories covering a wide range of applications. In the latest revision, there are 17 accessory categories to cover different stress environments and EMI protection requirements.

Within the AS85049, the test methods for accessory evaluation are listed. These cover the environmental stresses, fluid susceptibility assessments, mateability, mechanical stresses (vibration and physical shock), as well as electrical performance requirements. Taken together, the AS85049 provides a set of assessment methods to evaluate just about anything that might be attached to the backside of a connector.


EWIS inspection is mandated for part 25 aircraft and should be part of all other aircraft periodic maintenance and inspection activities (discussion of enhanced zonal analysis programs EZAP, can be found here). So, what should a maintainer look for with backshells during maintenance and periodic inspection activities?

To aid in the assessment of connector backshells from a maintenance perspective, the FAA funded a study to examine this issue . Specifically, the study examined how tightly bound a backshell must be to a connector before there was an impact to the backshell connector resistance.

Testing was performed to determine how backshell mating impacted the connector to accessory continuity. The results are especially important for EWIS harnesses with EMI sensitive wiring. Source FAA.

The testing examined the loop resistance for a series of backshells with the various degrees of disengagement (see accompanying figure for the test setup). The level of disengagement was identified by the rotation of the backshell from the proper set position.

Within the testing, there were three different levels of loosening:

  • Thread loose backshell: after the backshell was torqued to the particular manufacturer specifications, the backshell was loosened by rotating back between 90° and 360°. Once an additional thread of the connector was visually observable, then the backshell was declared thread loose.
  • Visually loose: The ‘visually loose’ term identified visually identifiable misalignment of the initial position marker.
  • Hand loose backshell: in this scenario, the backshell was identified as hand loose if it could be easily manipulated by hand.

As expected, as the backshell pulled back from the engagement with the connector, the loop resistance value increased. Data is presented in the FAA report showing how this loop resistance changed for the different connectors based upon various environmental stresses which included vibration, altitude and thermal cycling, and mechanical degradation.

Based on the above observations, the following is recommended.

  • Connector backshells should be checked for looseness during scheduled maintenance. Approaching this from an EZAP mindset, that means that each connector must be within arm’s reach during inspection and EWIS sustainment actions.
  • A visual inspection using a mark reference, to indicate any loosening of the backshell, is the most effective method for the two types of backshells studied. This mark can be made with a wax/silicon bead, a permanent marker, etc. If the backshells are not marked, a check for hand looseness should be performed during scheduled maintenance.
  • A visual inspection with no mark reference (thread loose) is not efficient in determining backshell looseness.
  • A loop resistance measurement should be made on wire bundles when their backshells are not visually or physically accessible during routine maintenance.

The conclusion of the FAA report indicates that there was a significant variance found during the testing between two different types of backshells. Because of this, there was a recommendation for an additional study to determine what was the best mechanism for maintenance procedures for a wide variety of backshells. Unfortunately, the FAA did not fund any additional study (the report was released in 2004 and FAA funding has moved to other areas), but the recommendations of the first body of work are still valid.

With that said, what does a maintainer or someone who was building a maintenance program need to consider for connectors and backshells? The enhanced zonal analysis procedures should include physically touching the back shells of connectors to ensure they are not loose. The results of the study did find that the loop resistance had the greatest degradation once the backshells could be physically turned by hand. Initial quality inspections of the connector backshell mating, can help to reduce the likelihood of backshell disengagement. Beyond this, the data from the FAA study can help to guide inspection intervals for these items.


Those testing new backshell configurations for their vehicle should consider the procedures outlined in the FAA document as a guide for assessment. The testing is relatively quick and can be very informative in the definition of maintenance/inspection procedures. This is certainly recommended for those backshells supporting high-speed data cables or EMI sensitive wiring. It is well established that maintaining a good shield to backshell to ground plane connection reduces the overall noise of the system.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification and the chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee.