View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Standard & Regulation Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment Management Conference & Report Protection & Prevention Research Miscellaneous Arcing
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection High Voltage AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS4373 Maintenance Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 AC 43 Accelerated Aging accessibility ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS29606 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS6324 AS81824 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM B355 ASTM B470 ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM D876 ASTM F2639 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive Avionics backshell batteries bend radius Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification cfr 25.1717 Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection cleaning clearance Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Conductor Testing conductors conduit Connector Connector rating connector selection connector testing connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) corrosion prevention Cracking creepage D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR electric aircraft Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electrified Vehicles Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) Electrostatic Discharge EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 Fault fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Fluid Immersion Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Fuse Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design harness protection hazard Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage High Voltage Degradation HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV connector HV system ICAs IEC 60851 IEC60172 IEEE immersion insertion loss Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning lightning protection liquid nitrogen lithium battery lunar Magnet wire maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-7928/5 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyamide polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Preventative Maintenance Program Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection separation Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy superconductor supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance volume resistivity vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Winding wire Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

High Voltage Arc Tracking Requirements (Part 2)

Testing & Assessment

Key Takeaways
  • Diversity in high-voltage systems raises the question of where and to what extent the responsibility of testing lies between the wire/cable manufacturer and the OEM.
  • The aviation industry must consider whether arc track resistance should be evaluated at the component-level or at the system-level for high-voltage systems.
  • Arc track resisting as we know it may be coming to an end as more HV systems with unique testing requirements lead the aviation industry moving forward.

Is it sufficient to verify individual components are safe for use or must there also be an assessment for safety at the system integration level? A gut reaction typically implies that a component must be deemed safe (and acceptable) before integration into the system, but what if the integration into the system makes its use safe? These are the questions that plague any engineer or system designer and are a fundamental challenge for those building an EWIS for a high voltage power system.

In Lectromec’s last article, basic component tests were considered for assessing high-voltage arc track resistance. While possible solutions were proposed, there were still gaps impeding full adoption. This article continues to explore potential solutions for assessing and quantifying arc track resistance for high voltage wires, albeit from the system integration, OEM, and regulator perspectives.

Specific Voltages – OEM Defined

Stepping back to voltage-specific testing for the particular application, one could expect limited performance testing to be done by wire/cable manufacturers. As there is no way for a wire/cable manufacturer to know or test for every power system type, the manufacturer may perform some preliminary tests or engineering evaluations to claim a certain voltage performance level (such as those in AIR 7502), but the particular arc track resistance requirements would be left to the aircraft OEM to substantiate for their particular power system. A parallel to this is seen with flex endurance testing; wire/cable manufacturers perform basic testing, but it is the responsibility of the system designer to validate the component for their application.

If this approach is taken, it puts the aircraft OEM back into the position of determining what test method is appropriate for their application, in particular, whether the OEM views arc track resistance as a component-level test or system-level test. If the arc track resistance is a component-level test, then generalized test methods can be used (box 4 or 5).

HV arc track flow chart
This flow chart is one of the many possible logical flows in identifying arc track resistance considerations for high voltage systems.

OEM and System Level Testing

If arc track resistance is determined to be a system-level test (box 8), then other factors such as the power system, specific circuit protection, and other aircraft OEM design factors should be introduced. This then changes the foundation of the testing from a material/component test to one that aligns more with the fielded system. The power system and circuit protection are aircraft-specific and have a significant impact on the test setup and results. If the power system uses slow responding circuit protection, such as thermal circuit breakers or fuses, the particular wire/cable configuration (insulation, shielding, etc.) has an appreciable impact.

However, if the power system uses advanced circuit protection technologies which may respond in milliseconds (box 10), should this not be factored in when determining the failed wire impact? The approach of box 10 pushes one to consider if the arc track resistance of these components in high voltage and high energy systems really matters.

At some point it must be accepted that the insulating materials that are used for aircraft wiring will be incapable of preventing cascading damage within wire harnesses unless the insulation becomes extremely thick and unusable for aerospace applications (assuming slow responding circuit protection scenarios). Taking the position that wires will have arcing failure conditions, (as is required from the perspective of FAR 25.1709) a different approach to the problem must be considered.

In accordance with AC25.1701-1, it must be assumed that any section of wire harness may be lost/damaged and the consequences must be assessed from both a physical and functional impact. How that failure occurs is left open but for this discussion, the assumption is that the wire harness is damaged through an electrical arcing event. One cannot assume that the wire harness will be set in any particular configuration limiting the cascading damage. Taking this approach, the materials of the wire harness have less of an impact, and an assessment of the worst-case arcing event that can occur given the available current, voltage, and circuit protection is required.

The aircraft OEM then needs to ensure that those aircraft components near the arcing wires are a sufficient distance away to prevent cascading damage and ensure that the loss of the single wire harness does not result in a hazardous or catastrophic failure event. This is something that should already be done for every aircraft that is EWIS compliant and certified.

HV arc track flow chart
Direct contact between a wire conductor and a conductive aircraft component is a relatively simple failure mode to quantify. When this test is done considering system separation, factors such as ambient air pressure, air flow, enclosure size, and others creep into the equation.


This thought exercise for EWIS wire arc track resistance requirements suggests that the era of performing arc track resistance for wiring distributed power through an aircraft may be coming to an end. From a wire/cable producer standpoint, arc track resistance testing requirements for high voltage systems will become so fractured that it will be impossible to ensure arc track resistance for a generalized application as has been done for low voltage systems (e.g., 115VAC power systems).

From an OEM perspective, focusing on the aircraft requirements seems more practical than searching for components that may be able to achieve the same arc damage resistance properties that have been used for part selection for the last four decades.

However the next generation of wire and cable are tested for arc track performance, Lectromec’s ISO 17025 accredited lab will be here and ready to help.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification and the chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee.