View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Standard & Regulation Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment Protection & Prevention Management Conference & Report Research Miscellaneous Arcing
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection High Voltage AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) AS4373 Maintenance FAR 25.1707 Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 AC 43 Accelerated Aging accessibility ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS29606 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS6324 AS81824 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM B355 ASTM B470 ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM D876 ASTM F2639 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive Avionics backshell batteries bend radius Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification cfr 25.1717 Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection cleaning clearance Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Conductor Testing conductors conduit Connector connector installation Connector rating connector selection connector testing connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) corrosion prevention Cracking creepage D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR electric aircraft Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electrified Vehicles Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) Electrostatic Discharge EMC EMF EMI EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 Fault fault tree Filter Line Cable Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Fluid Immersion Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Fuse Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design harness protection hazard Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage High Voltage Degradation HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV connector HV system ICAs IEC 60851 IEC60172 IEEE immersion insertion loss Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning lightning protection liquid nitrogen lithium battery lunar Magnet wire maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-7928/5 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyamide polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Preventative Maintenance Program Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection separation separation distance Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy superconductor supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance volume resistivity vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Winding wire Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

EWIS regulatory compliance: 25.1703, Part II

Testing & Assessment

Aerospace wiring requirements like the FAA regulation §25.1703 can be difficult to comprehend in one sitting. Lectromec has taken this complex document on EWIS regulatory compliance and divided it into some logical categories. In our last podcast titled An EWIS Perspective, we examined concepts in expected life and discussed how to select components designed for aerospace wiring applications. We continue the series by looking at other parts of the 1703 requirements (previous article available here).

Properly Functioning EWIS

Perhaps some of the more important items mentioned in the 1703 recommendations are the ones related to properly functioning EWIS equipment. They are included in the Advisory Circular (AC) 25.1701-1:

…the fact that an In-Flight Entertainment (IFE) system fails to deliver satisfactory picture or sound quality is not what the term “properly” refers to, is not a safety issue, and thus is not a certification issue. Failure of an Electrical Wiring Interconnect System (EWIS) component has the potential for being a safety hazard whether it is part of a safety-related system or an IFE system.

This closely aligns with the recommendations associated with §25.1709 which state that, regardless of probability, the failure impact of a wire harness must be considered. Just because the EWIS component is attached to a non-flight critical system, does not mean that the form or function can be ignored. From an installation perspective, the EWIS must function properly, “as it is related to the airworthiness of the airplane.”

To further highlight important EWIS installation factors, we also must understand the impact of mechanical stresses on the EWIS. With the improvement of Computer Assisted Design (CAD) of EWIS routing and harness design, the fit of harnesses has significantly improved to match the installation. In years past, it was not uncommon for a harness to be too short to fit the wire run (or was very snug). When this happened, there were a couple of options that could be implemented by the installation team:

EWIS regulatory compliance
The separation distance between clamps should be such that the harness is secured and that there is not too much sag as to violate separation distances.

1. The “Pull real hard” technique

This self-explanatory method could result in several situations. The harnesses would ride tighter in clamps, compress bend radii, and cause damage to the harness by forcing it through an already tightened clamp. If the “pull hard” technique was successful, it may have damaged crimps and/or conductors such that system checks would fail.

2. Reroute

While this is likely to place less stress on the harness than forcing the harness to fit, it can create other problems. For instance, it might require addition mounting holes or reduce the originally designed separation distance. Also, if not properly documented, it is likely that each installation would be slightly different, which places additional hardship on maintainers. If the reroute is necessary, it should be done only with design review.

3. Splice in an additional length of wire to the harness

While not ideal, this adds the length necessary to avoid the other two issues listed above. Use of this technique should be limited as it creates additional failure points in the harness.

Methods to reduce the mechanical stress on the wiring such as conduit, clamps, and strain relief should be implemented as needed. Standards such as AS50881, provide recommendations for the maximum separation of primary harnesses support. Harnesses that are more rigid can have primary support that is further separated, but sagging must be considered with wider clamp separation.

1703(C) – Deformation

The third part of 25.1703 states:

(c) The design and installation of the main power cables (including generator cables) in the fuselage must allow for a reasonable degree of deformation and stretching without failure.

Beyond the consideration of support, it is recommended that power feeder cables are designed to allow for “a certain amount of stretching.” This allows for a reasonable degree of deformation that might occur in the case of fuselage damage. The AC recommends the stretch should be about 10% of the required cable length. Note that this part of the regulations specifically calls out the power feeder cables, and makes no mention of signal or the secondary power distribution cables. From a regulatory perspective, secondary power systems do not fall under this requirement.

But what about distributed power system designs? The power delivery through the aircraft to each of the distribution points creates a scenario in which the main power cables should satisfy the requirements discussed here. For those implementing, or planning to implement distributed power systems, this is an additional factor that should be considered during the design and certification preparation stage.

Segment three will cover more of the §25.1703 regulation.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.