View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Maintenance & Sustainment Conference & Report Research Protection & Prevention Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 High Voltage FAR Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 AS4373 Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive backshell batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connector selection connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV system ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning liquid nitrogen lunar maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

DO-254 process for aircraft component certification

Certification

RTCA/DO-254, Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware is a commonly used document that provides instructions and process for airborne electronic hardware development and aircraft component certification. Formally recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in 2005, the DO-254 serves as a standard for ensuring the highest level of safety in the design of electronic airborne systems.

Process Requirements

This standard includes a process that has very rigorous compliance requirements. That is because it has five levels of compliance, A through E, that are hardware failure effect dependent and the subsequent impact on aircraft airworthiness. For example, a Level E failure would not affect the aircraft’s safety (low failure severity) while a Level A failure would result in a catastrophic failure and loss of aircraft and/or life (certainly a high failure severity). As one might expect, satisfying Level A compliance requirements necessitates more effort and attention to verification and validation than satisfying Level E compliance requirements.

component certification

Illustrated in the above flow chart is the typical process flow of a DO-254 compliant design. By going through the associated tasks of this process, the design should prove that its implementation meets all of the requirements. Different tasks may be used depending on the project in question, however a key principle remains constant: verification results must be traceable and linked to the formal requirements.

Requirement Tracking

Because of the importance of requirements in the verification process, capturing the formal requirements is the first step in any DO-254 design development and it is often done by using a special tool such as IBM’s DOORS® or Mentor Graphics’ ReqTracer. After all project requirements have been discussed and accounted for, the design specification and verification plan are generated. These documents are required by the FAA for certification by DO-254 compliance regulations and are used in a ‘Verification and Validation’ process at the end of the design process.

After making a list of formal requirements, the tools used in the process must also be assessed. This tool assessment includes verification and validation of both input and output of these utilized design tools. For this purpose, a document entitled the ‘Plan for Hardware Aspects of Certification (PHAC)’ is created and used. The document should contain information pertaining to the functionality, suitability, and any known limitations of the tools selected for the project. The Independent Output Assessment, relevant history, and basic tool qualification of each tool is described and compiled into the PHAC document.

component certification

Verification and Validation

As with any formal hardware design assurance process, the ‘Verification and Validation’ is the most crucial phase in a DO-254 compliant design process and occurs throughout the project lifetime. It ensures that the requirements are valid, implemented, and fully tested even after becoming certified. Tests are run and models are created to prove that the project successfully meets the formal requirements and does the desired function. The project must continue to undergo the process even after it has been certified to assure continued DO-254 compliant performance.

Lastly, before submitting the project to the FAA for approval, a ‘Hardware Accomplishments Summary’ (HAS) is written to assemble the compliance data accumulated during the project development period. The document should demonstrate that the project has achieved the objectives outlined in the initial final requirements, design specification, verification plan, and the PHAC. Once the team is satisfied that the DO-254 compliancy process has been followed correctly and satisfactorily, the HAS can be submitted for FAA certification and assessment.

More Information

For more information about the RTCA/DO-254, read the White Paper and Position Paper on the subject. These documents provide more in-depth explanations and details about the process and references for additional reading.

Emma Schwoerer

Emma Schwoerer

Emma is a full time engineering student at The George Washington University. She works at Lectromec as a junior engineer on a variety of projects including wire testing, aged platform assessment, and arc damage modeling.