View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Standard & Regulation Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment Management Conference & Report Protection & Prevention Research Miscellaneous Arcing
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection High Voltage AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS4373 Maintenance Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 AC 43 Accelerated Aging accessibility ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS29606 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS6324 AS81824 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM B355 ASTM B470 ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM D876 ASTM F2639 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive Avionics backshell batteries bend radius Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification cfr 25.1717 Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection cleaning clearance Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Conductor Testing conductors conduit Connector Connector rating connector selection connector testing connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) corrosion prevention Cracking creepage D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR electric aircraft Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electrified Vehicles Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) Electrostatic Discharge EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 Fault fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Fluid Immersion Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Fuse Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design harness protection hazard Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage High Voltage Degradation HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV connector HV system ICAs IEC 60851 IEC60172 IEEE immersion insertion loss Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning lightning protection liquid nitrogen lithium battery lunar Magnet wire maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-7928/5 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyamide polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Preventative Maintenance Program Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection separation Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy superconductor supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance volume resistivity vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Winding wire Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code
Key Takeaways
  • Tools, equipment, materials, and an adequate understanding of each are integral to any maintenance task.
  • Specialized equipment and materials are utilized in the process of cleaning avionics components.
  • Proper knowledge and methods are utilized to minimize the possibility of hazards to personnel and equipment.


In two previous Lectromec articles (part 1, part 2), we discussed preventative measures, identification methods, and cleaning procedures for corrosion on avionics equipment identified in AC 43-206. Here, we discuss some of the cleaning equipment/tools, materials, and potential hazards identified in AC 43-206.

Tools, equipment, and materials are clearly an integral part of any maintenance task and, in coordination with these, an understanding of potential hazards is a must. Anyone involved in maintenance must be educated in the proper use/application of any materials, tools, or equipment they are expected to use as well as the potential risks posed by exposure to or misuse of such items.

Cleaning Equipment

Due to the diverse variety of avionics equipment present on a single aircraft, many different tools are required for adequate maintenance. The minimum requirements for an adequately equipped cleaning facility are identified in the AC as follows:

  • Facility/ Equipment
    • Adequate lighting
    • Applicable cleaning and support equipment
    • Ventilation system with controlled temperature and humidity
    • Sufficient space for any cleaning equipment to be operated
  • Documentation
    • Operational instructions/manuals for all applicable equipment
    • MSDS/ Hazardous SDS for each substance used (cleaning fluids, etc.)
  • Trained Personnel
    • Quality assurance inspectors
    • Avionics technicians
    • Support equipment operators
    • Those trained in accordance with AC 43-206 to identify corrosion of avionics

Outside of the more straightforward hand-cleaning methods many of the common cleaning equipment can be categorized as abrasive cleaning tools, ultrasonic cleaners, or spray booths

According to AC 43-206 “Abrasive cleaning tools such as portable mini-abrasive units and blast cleaning cabinets are used to remove corrosion and corrosive products.” Though useful in a wide variety of cleaning applications, it is important to understand the limitations of abrasive cleaning tools; many sensitive pieces of avionics equipment are prone to damage under abrasive conditions (the medium used for abrasion particularly affects this); either the use of alternate methods or the expertise of properly trained personnel must be considered in these situations.

Ultrasonic cleaners are employed for the removal of oils, dust grease, hydraulic fluid, and loose corrosion deposits on certain avionics equipment. These machines clean using either a solvent solution or an aqueous detergent solution for ultrasonic scrubbing of the equipment to be cleaned. Only approved detergents and solvents should be used in ultrasonic cleaners.

A water base spray booth may be used for either rinsing or cleaning of avionics equipment as applicable; it is preferable that such a booth be equipped with a 360o turntable to allow for the rotation of the avionics equipment within. If used for rinsing equipment, the spray booth may be utilized before and/or after other cleaning methods are applied.

AC 43-206 Table 4-2
Table 4-2 from AC 43-206

Table 4-2 of AC 43-206 identifies common avionics equipment along with the cleaning tool(s) recommended for each piece of equipment.

Materials/ Fluids

AC 43-206 identifies the following fluids for use in avionics cleaning:

  • Nonionic liquid detergent Type I MIL-D-16791
  • Electrical contact cleaning and lubricating compound Type I MIL-C-83360
  • Trichlorotrifluoroethane cleaning compound Type II MIL-C-81302
  • Dry cleaning solvent Type II P-D-680
  • Isopropyl alcohol TT-I-735
  • Distilled water

The AC goes on to describe the characteristics, applications, and restrictions for each fluid.

One of the key practices in the use of solvents and detergents is ensuring the correct concentration when mixing the fluids in water. The concentration of the aqueous solution needed for cleaning different parts will vary based on the part’s component materials.

Hazards and Considerations

As with any maintenance work, avionics cleaning comes with its own set of potential hazards; this includes hazards to equipment as well as hazards to personnel. There are many such concerns to bear in mind when developing cleaning instructions and performing cleaning actions on avionics components. Some pieces of equipment may become damaged when exposed to inappropriate cleaning fluids or methods, others may be prone to entrap cleaning fluids or other debris during maintenance activities.

Lectromec has worked on projects where cleaning of the wiring harnesses was prohibited as maintenance data showed an increase in EWIS failures after cleaning; it is important to note that these platforms were due for decommissioning within a couple of years and a risk assessment was performed to justify these decisions.

Cleaning materials and fluids can be contributors to both equipment and personnel hazards. Some cleaning fluids contain CFC materials (Chlorofluorocarbons) which are known to be ozone-depleting substances; there may even be applicable environmental restrictions that ban or limit use. But even apparently mundane cleaning fluids may become hazardous if used incorrectly.

Cleaning methods must also be applied appropriately to avoid hazards to equipment and personnel. The use of incorrect cleaning methods for specific pieces of equipment may irreparably damage the equipment. For instance, there are devices within some PCBs (Printed Circuit Boards) particularly sensitive to electrostatic discharge that “may be destroyed by the static charge created in the rapid movement of air and abrasive agents in the abrasive cleaning tools.” Thus, it is imperative to identify an alternative safe cleaning method for such devices. Incorrect use of tools and machinery may also lead to injury of personnel.

Precautionary measures must be taken to protect both equipment and personnel during maintenance actions. The use of gloves, masks, goggles, and support equipment, as applicable, can be effective for protecting personnel, however, the most effective personnel protection is proper training. To minimize hazards during maintenance, AC 43-206 recommends the following pre-cleaning procedures:

  1. “Disconnect electrical and other power sources (mechanical/hydraulic).
  2. Ensure the work area and equipment are safe for maintenance.
  3. Ensure drain holes are open.
  4. Remove covers and panels for accessibility.
  5. Disassemble where practicable.
  6. Use only authorized materials.
  7. Ensure compatibility of materials prior to use.
  8. Mask and protect accessories or components to prevent intrusion of water, solvents, and cleaning solutions.”


At first glance, it may seem excessive to have such a lengthy document dedicated solely to corrosion prevention and maintenance on aircraft, but in a series of three articles, we have only reached the surface level of understanding corrosion modes, prevention, and maintenance. Due to the sensitive nature and extensive variety of avionics components present on a single aircraft detailed methods and instructions are crucial to avoid additional damage. Resources such as AC 43-206 are extremely valuable to anyone involved in aircraft maintenance activities, from the hands-on maintenance technician to the component manufacturer developing maintenance instructions for a specific part.

Contact Lectromec today for further information on how we can help with your corrosion assessment and prevention needs.

Laura Wishart

Laura Wishart

Engineer, Lectromec

Laura has been with Lectromec since 2019 and has been a key contributor to projects involving testing of EWIS/fuel system failure modes, the impact of poor installation practices on EWIS longevity, and wire/cable certification testing. Her knowledge and attention to detail ensure consistent delivery of accurate test results from Lectromec’s lab.