View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Standard & Regulation Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment Management Conference & Report Protection & Prevention Research Miscellaneous Arcing
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection High Voltage AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS4373 Maintenance Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 AC 43 Accelerated Aging accessibility ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS29606 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS6324 AS81824 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM B355 ASTM B470 ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM D876 ASTM F2639 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive Avionics backshell batteries bend radius Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification cfr 25.1717 Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection cleaning clearance Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Conductor Testing conductors conduit Connector connector installation Connector rating connector selection connector testing connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) corrosion prevention Cracking creepage D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR electric aircraft Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electrified Vehicles Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) Electrostatic Discharge EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 Fault fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Fluid Immersion Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Fuse Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design harness protection hazard Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage High Voltage Degradation HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV connector HV system ICAs IEC 60851 IEC60172 IEEE immersion insertion loss Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning lightning protection liquid nitrogen lithium battery lunar Magnet wire maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-7928/5 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyamide polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Preventative Maintenance Program Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection separation separation distance Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy superconductor supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance volume resistivity vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Winding wire Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

Impact of Wires Used as Ladders

Testing & Assessment

Key Takeaways
  • Using wire harnesses as handhold is dis-advised.
  • Testing shows impact small weights can have on conductor performance.
  • Signal circuits are the most likely to be impacted when conductor resistance increases.

Maintaining an airplane can be as tricky as flying one. With millions of parts, fastidious attention to detail in maintenance is necessary to make sure that every individual piece is up to the high industry standard. Care for aircraft electrical systems can be exceptionally demanding; a B747, for example, has about 150 miles of wire, and even a small Cessna has between three to eight miles. This electrical wiring interconnect system (EWIS) network connects all of the aircraft systems.

Ideally, an aircraft’s EWIS aging is considered and monitored over time, but something as simple as gripping and pulling a wire or cable can change its electrical performance, specifically conductivity and resistance.

What is the issue?

When an aircraft is being assembled, much of the wiring system is in an exposed state. Further into the construction, wire harnesses are progressively combined and routed around structures, into clamps, and finally attached to aircraft components. Throughout the life of the plane, during some maintenance operations (particularly heavy maintenance, commercially known as D-checks), the wiring can also be exposed as it was during construction. It is during these times where the wiring is at the greatest risk of deformation through elongation; a technician may use the wiring harness to hang tools, or as something to grab onto to help get up into the plane.

These stresses on the wire can have a negative effect on the conductor. Like with all components, stresses below a threshold cause no damage. But by forcefully pulling on a wire harness, there is a chance that the stress will exceed the performance threshold and yield physical damage.

FAA Job Aid on Handholds
The FAA is pretty clear use of wire harnesses as footholds; just don’t do it. Source: FAA

The issues of wire damage due to mechanical stress have been known for quite some time. The “FAA Job Aid” on EWIS has several sections that especially address the issue:

  • Slide 37: “Position to eliminate/minimize use as handhold or support”
  • Slide 126: “Do not locate conduit where service or maintenance personnel might use as handhold or footstep”
  • Slide 161: Wiring installation drawings shall consider human factor elements such as using wiring as “foot/step holds”

FAA advisory circular 25.1701-1 also states that wiring should be protected from normal maintenance and crew operations:

“Wire bundles should be routed in accessible areas that are protected from damage from personnel, cargo, and maintenance activity. As far as practicable they should not be routed in areas where they are likely to be used as handholds or as support for personal equipment or where they could become damaged during removal of aircraft equipment (reference §§ 25.1719 and 25.1721).”

Empirical Evidence

To ultimately demonstrate the effect of using a wiring harness as a handhold or ladder, Lectromec setup a simple experiment. A single ten-foot section of 20AWG wire was secured at both ends with the center section spanning an open area.

Test Setup
The wire strain impact test setup.

For the experiment, the conductor resistance was initially measured free of weights. A five-pound (2.26 kg) weight was then gently added to the center of the wire and left for 60 seconds. The weight was removed, and the conductor resistance measured. This procedure was repeated with weights of 10, 15, and 20 lbs.

Applied Weight(lbs.)

Percentage of Resistance Change From Initial Value at 0lbs









Test results

The more weight applied to the conductor coincides with the increase in resistance. At maximum applied weight, there was a 6.40% increase in the measured wire resistance. The deformation of the conductor causes increased resistance and increased heat, which initiates a cycle that only continues to impact the performance of the conductor. In a system of 100V, this may not seem like much, but in a signal wire with 5V and sensitive electronic equipment, the change can be far greater and more detrimental to the system.


This testing evaluated the impact on a single wire, but what about the impact on a full wire harness? Bundling wires together will make the harness stiffer and better able to endure physical stresses. It is likely that a wire harness will need more physical stressing to yield the same effect measured with the single wire. But how many wire harnesses in an aircraft are identified as, “safe for a 200lbs technician to use as a ladder”?


Wire harnesses should be protected to prevent their use as equipment support and handholds. Keep in mind that the resistance was measured after just one minute of applied weight; think of what can happen when dozens of techs use the same wire harness as a ladder. While a 6.40% resistance change might not seem like much, wires carrying digital circuits are sensitive to voltage changes and are more likely to encounter lost signal packets and poor performing LRUs.

Devon Gonteski

Devon Gonteski

Engineer, Lectromec

Devon has been with Lectromec since 2017 and has been a key contributor on projects involving wire degradation assessment and wire/cable certification testing. Her skills in Lectromec’s lab ensure regular delivery of accurate test results across multiple disciplines.