View Latest Blog Entries
Close
Categories
Testing & Assessment Certification Aging Wires & Systems Standard & Regulation Management Maintenance & Sustainment Conference & Report Research Protection & Prevention Arcing Miscellaneous
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 High Voltage FAR Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 AS4373 Maintenance Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 Accelerated Aging ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive backshell batteries Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor conductors conduit Connector connector selection connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) Cracking D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV system ICAs IEC60172 IEEE Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning liquid nitrogen lunar maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

Selection of Zones for Degradation Testing

Maintenance & Sustainment

Maintenance zones within an aircraft are not homogeneous. They vary from the extreme areas within the aircraft (engines) to more benign areas (inside pressure and temperature-controlled areas). And because of this, the components within each of these zones will age at different rates. Naturally, different components are selected for each of these zones; those components better able to handle the severe environments are installed in those environments, and lower requirements are placed on those parts installed in benign environments.

2020 Lectromec Webinar

This creates a challenge from a maintenance perspective: if different components are in different environments, should that not mean that the degradation across all zones will turn out to be the same? And if the aircraft has been in service for 20 years, can this degradation be quantified to provide a path for directed maintenance actions?

Here, we will address this question by breaking it down to the where to start the assessment, if zones can logically group, and some of the insights that degradation assessments can provide.

It Starts with Assessment

Like all other efforts, there must be a reason to justify the time and expense. For those on the commercial side, this justification may be part of Instruction for Continued Airworthiness (ICAs), development of Enhanced Zonal Awareness Program (EZAP), or extending the service life of the vehicle where data is necessary to support the maintenance/sustain actions. For those on the military side, it depends on the organization, but often the wiring system degradation assessment is part of fleet sustainment activities and/or Service Life Assessment/Extension Programs (SLAP/SLEP). For the US Air Force, this is codified in the Mechanical Equipment and Subsystems Integrity Program (MECSIP) standard MIL-STD-1798.

After the justification is the zone identification. A good starting point is to align this with the maintenance zones; these are already well defined and consistent across most of the similar aircraft in the fleet (those on the commercial side could start with the documents already developed to be in compliance with the EZAP requirements).

Once the zones and their boundaries have been identified, the next step is to identify the environmental, operational, and maintenance factors in that zone. These factors should include:

  • Temperature
  • Vibration
  • Chemicals
  • Humidity
  • Contamination
  • Likelihood of Foreign object debris (FOD)
  • Weather effects
  • Frequency of Maintenance actions

These items alone do not help much from a degradation perspective (e.g. saying that contamination may occur does not mean much unless the chemical susceptibility of the components is known). To understand their impact and the weighted factors related to component degradation requires knowledge of the component in those zones and how they degrade.

Grouping of zone for degradation testing
Not all zones need to be tested. The zones can be grouped to reduce the total number of zones where samples must be extracted.

Grouping

After the environmental severity of each maintenance zone has been identified, the next step is to logically group those zones with the same/similar components and that have similar degradation factors. Doing this has the benefits of reducing the total number of zones that need degradation investigation. In many of the aircraft Lectromec has examined, the number of zones for investigation ranges from 8 – 12.

More information about degradation assessment methods and results can be found here.

The Untested Zones

Using the techniques described here, not all zones need to be tested. It is possible to use the similarity of environmental factors and degradation risk to group and pare down zones. But what about those zones that are not tested, can the results be applied? This is where it is important to have well-researched degradation models for the tested components. If, for example, zones A, B, and C are grouped together and samples are tested from group C, then the relative degradation rate between C=>A and C=>B can be applied and a good aging estimate can be made for zones A and B based on the zone C data.

How to get started

Wiring system degradation assessments are not a complicated process but understanding all the elements that can have an impact is a challenge. Starting from existing industry guidance and policies as the framework, the particular needs of the EWIS can be addressed and effective results can be achieved to direct maintenance actions, increase maintenance effectiveness, and provide a return on investment. Those that are interested should consider registering for Lectromec’s webinar on July 1st.