View Latest Blog Entries
Testing & Assessment Certification Standard & Regulation Aging Wires & Systems Maintenance & Sustainment Management Conference & Report Protection & Prevention Research Miscellaneous Arcing
Popular Tags
Visual Inspection High Voltage AS50881 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-525 FAR AS4373 Maintenance Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) FAR 25.1707 Wire System Arcing Damage
All Tags in Alphabetical Order
2021 25.1701 25.1703 abrasion AC 33.4-3 AC 43 Accelerated Aging accessibility ADMT Aging Systems AIR6808 AIR7502 Aircraft Power System aircraft safety Aircraft Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) altitude arc damage Arc Damage Modeling Tool Arc Fault (AF) Arc Fault Circuit Breaker (AFCB) Arc Track Resistance Arcing Arcing Damage AS22759 AS22759/87 AS23053 AS29606 AS4373 AS4373 Method 704 AS50881 AS5692 AS6019 AS6324 AS81824 AS83519 AS85049 AS85485 AS85485 Wire Standard ASTM B355 ASTM B470 ASTM D150 ASTM D2671 ASTM D8355 ASTM D876 ASTM F2639 ASTM F2696 ASTM F2799 ASTM F3230 ASTM F3309 ATSRAC Attenuation Automated Wire Testing System (AWTS) Automotive Avionics backshell batteries bend radius Bent Pin Analysis Best of Lectromec Best Practice bonding Cable Cable Bend cable testing Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Certification cfr 25.1717 Chafing Chemical Testing Circuit Breaker circuit design Circuit Protection cleaning clearance Coaxial cable cold bend collision comparative analysis Compliance Component Selection Condition Based Maintenance Conductor Conductor Testing conductors conduit Connector Connector rating connector selection connector testing connectors contacts Corona Corrosion Corrosion Preventing Compound (CPC) corrosion prevention Cracking creepage D-sub data analysis data cables degradat Degradation Delamination Derating design safety development diagnostic Dielectric breakdown dielectric constant Dimensional Life disinfectant Distributed Power System DO-160 dry arc dynamic cut through E-CFR electric aircraft Electrical Aircraft Electrical Component Electrical Power Electrical Testing Electrified Vehicles Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Electromagnetic Vulnerability (EMV) Electrostatic Discharge EMC EMF EN2235 EN3197 EN3475 EN6059 End of Service Life End of Year Energy Storage engines Environmental Environmental Cycling environmental stress ethernet eVTOL EWIS certification EWIS Component EWIS Design EWIS Failure EWIS sustainment EWIS Thermal Management EZAP FAA FAA AC 25.27 FAA AC 25.981-1C FAA Meeting failure conditions Failure Database Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) FAQs FAR FAR 25.1703 FAR 25.1707 FAR 25.1709 Fault fault tree Fixturing Flammability fleet reliability Flex Testing fluid exposure Fluid Immersion Forced Hydrolysis fuel system fuel tank ignition Functional Hazard Assessment functional testing Fundamental Articles Fuse Future Tech galvanic corrosion Glycol Gold Gold plating Green Taxiing Grounding hand sanitizer handbook Harness Design harness protection hazard Hazard Analysis health monitoring heat shrink heat shrink tubing high current high Frequency high speed data cable High Voltage High Voltage Degradation HIRF History Hot Stamping Humidity Variation HV connector HV system ICAs IEC 60851 IEC60172 IEEE immersion insertion loss Inspection installation installation safety Instructions for Continued Airworthiness insulating material insulating tape Insulation insulation breakdown insulation resistance insulation testing interchangeability IPC-D-620 ISO 17025 Certified Lab ISO 9000 J1673 Kapton Laser Marking life limit life limited parts Life prediction life projection Lightning lightning protection liquid nitrogen lithium battery lunar Magnet wire maintainability Maintenance Maintenance costs Mandrel mean free path measurement mechanical stress Mechanical Testing MECSIP MIL-C-38999 MIL-C-85485 MIL-DTL-17 MIL-DTL-23053E MIL-DTL-3885G MIL-DTL-38999 MIL-E-25499 MIL-HDBK MIL-HDBK-1646 MIL-HDBK-217 MIL-HDBK-454 MIL-HDBK-516 MIL-HDBK-522 MIL-HDBK-525 MIL-HDBK-683 MIL-STD-1353 MIL-STD-1560 MIL-STD-1798 MIL-STD-464 MIL-T-7928 MIL-T-7928/5 MIL-T-81490 MIL-W-22759/87 MIL-W-5088 MIL–STD–5088 Military 5088 modeling moon MS3320 NASA NEMA27500 Nickel nickel plating No Fault Found OEM off gassing Outgassing Over current Overheating of Wire Harness Parallel Arcing part selection Partial Discharge partial discharge at altitude Performance physical hazard assessment Physical Testing polyamide polyimdie Polyimide-PTFE Power over Ethernet power system Power systems predictive maintenance Presentation Preventative Maintenance Program Probability of Failure Product Quality PTFE pull through Radiation Red Plague Corrosion Reduction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) regulations relays Reliability Research Resistance Revision C Rewiring Project Risk Assessment S&T Meeting SAE SAE Committee Sanitizing Fluids Secondary Harness Protection separation Separation Requirements Series Arcing Service Life Extension Severe Wind and Moisture-Prone (SWAMP) Severity of Failure shelf life Shield Shielding Shrinkage signal signal cable Silver silver plated wire silver-plating skin depth skin effect Small aircraft smoke Solid State Circuit Breaker Space Certified Wires Splice standards Storage stored energy superconductor supportability Sustainment System Voltage Temperature Rating Temperature Variation Test methods Test Pricing Testing testing standard Thermal Circuit Breaker Thermal Endurance Thermal Index Thermal Runaway Thermal Shock Thermal Testing tin Tin plated conductors tin plating tin solder tin whiskering tin whiskers top 5 Transient Troubleshooting TWA800 UAVs UL94 USAF validation verification video Visual Inspection voltage voltage differential Voltage Tolerance volume resistivity vw-1 wet arc white paper whitelisting Winding wire Wire Ampacity Wire Bend Wire Certification Wire Comparison wire damage wire failure wire performance wire properties Wire System wire testing Wire Verification wiring components work unit code

Fluid Immersion Testing of EWIS Components

Testing & Assessment

Key Takeaways
  • Fluid immersion testing provides valuable information regarding the material compatibility of EWIS components and fluids they are expected to be exposed to during their service life.
  • EWIS components need only be tested against fluids anticipated to be present in their unique application, not necessarily every fluid identified in AS4373.
  • Post-immersion testing should be intuitively determined based on the application of each wire/ cable.

From fuel to hydraulic oil to sodas, aircraft wires and cables are exposed to a wide range of fluids and, generally, the insulations must not show degradation that would impact their airworthiness. Material compatibility is important for all parts of the aircraft and the wiring system is no exception. The means to assess material compatibility between fluids and wires/cables is done with fluid immersion testing.

Fluid immersion testing is straightforward but requires a lot of materials, a lot of prep work, and a lot of hands-on attention to detail. The fundamental idea of fluid immersion testing is for components to be submerged in the fluid and observed for any changes to the material or components. Some test details and the impacts of the test results are covered here.

Starting with AS4373

The AS4373 test standard identifies 20 of the most commonly used fluids for aerospace applications. These fluids include a variety of fuels, hydraulic fluids, deicers, cleaners, and lubricants. Many of these are fluids that a typical aircraft will encounter during normal operations. However, some are specialized and uncommon.

The sample may be submerged at ambient temperature or an elevated temperature. Selection of the elevated temperature should consider operational conditions and material properties such as the evaporation and flashpoint of the fluids. The exposure duration is dependent upon the likelihood of fluid encounter and the likelihood of exposure for extended durations.

After exposure to the fluid, the sample is removed, wiped dry, and the diameter of the sample is measured at multiple locations to determine if there has been any swelling or shrinkage (as compared to the pre-fluid exposure diameter). For cylindrical wire/cables, this is a simple task, however with non-uniform (non-cylindrical) cables, special attention is required to measure the major and minor axes.

Red Plague Process
Fluid immersion of a sample wire; a length of 24 inches is submerged in the test fluid and three immersion trials are performed for each fluid.


After diameter measurements, the sample is bent around a mandrel of a specified diameter based on the wire/cable diameter, and a post-test dielectric voltage withstand test is performed. The pass/fail criteria are based on a limited change of diameter (typically less than 5%) and no loss of dielectric integrity. Most of the materials used for aerospace wire/cable will be inert to these fluids, but changes in processing and additives may impact material performance, thus the reason for testing.

The testing outlined in AS4373 is directed to insulated wires and there is no assessment of what impact the fluid might have on the conductor. One standard that deviates from this is the metalized fiber standard MIL-DTL-32630. In this standard, the expectation is for the metalized fiber to be directly exposed to the fluids and not lose more than 25% of the elongation and tensile strength performance.

Beyond the Test

Note, just because a sample passes on the fluid immersion testing, does not mean that there are no other factors to consider. Research performed by the USAF (United States Air Force) showed that CPCs (Corrosion Preventative Compounds) may leave behind a residue on wires and cables making them more susceptible to ignition and more likely to fail standard flammability testing. Current guidance is in place to protect us from CPCs when applying them to large areas within a vehicle.

While different standards will have different identified fluids for fluid exposure, most share a basic common principle of placing a sample into a fluid and observing material changes through basic material assessments. Certainly, system-specific assessments can be done as part of the overall process. For example, if a sample may be exposed to fluid for an extended duration, and is installed in a vibration-prone environment, it may be advantageous to perform post-fluid exposure hardness testing or abrasion testing to determine if the material has softened due to fluid exposure.

Challenges with Test Performance

While the testing can seem simple, there are several factors that complicate the testing:

  1. Sourcing: There is no single source for every fluid, and finding fluids with sufficient shelf life, production traceability, and in quantities for testing (1-gallon versus 55-gallon drums) can feel like a full-time activity.
  2. Disposal: Many of the fluids require special disposal.
  3. Temperature Control: While testing at ambient temperature is simple, elevated temperature exposure with flammable fluids is a challenge.

Remembering the Purpose of the Test

It is important to remember for non-wire/cable producers that standards like AS4373 are designed to provide guidance for the general case; a cable that is sold to the broad market should cover as many reasonable fluids as practical. However, this does not mean that a wire must undergo exposure to every fluid listed to be qualified for application. What the wire/cable must do is show material compatibility with the fluids that it will or may encounter in application. For example, an all-electric aircraft will not have kerosene fuel; the wire/cable may come in contact with kerosene during normal airport operations but long-term exposure of components to kerosene is unnecessary.


One of the many tests that wires/cables must undergo is the fluid resistance test. If the test method is accurately followed for an application – all of the fluids encountered during normal operation are tested and the post-exposure wire/cable performance is verified – then one can expect a long, uneventful service life, as far as fluid impact is concerned. How fluids might impact the wire/cable performance beyond a simple diameter measurement and mechanical bending is left up to the individual application; there are only so many permutations of testing that can be performed before a wire/cable is brought to market.

For those interested in fluid immersion testing, Lectromec’s ISO 17025-accredited lab is ready to help. Contact us to find out more.

Michael Traskos

Michael Traskos

President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. Michael is an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification and the chairman of the SAE AE-8A EWIS installation committee.