Request a Quote
Aging Wires & Systems

Life prediction of aircraft EWIS components

 ·  Michael Traskos

Aircraft vehicle reliability rests on well-designed components maintaining full functionality through the entire life cycle, or at the very least, maintaining full functionality until a predictable life limit is reached so that sustainment activities can be performed.

Selection of wires and EWIS components is no different. The selection process starts with the functional requirements (electrical load, functionality, etc.) followed by defining the physical requirements (environmental factors, mechanical stresses, chemical resistance, etc.). Defining the operational environment characteristics should reduce the list of possible wire/cable specifications to a couple of candidates. But what if the list of candidates doesn’t match your need? What should you do if the configuration is outside the known test parameters for a given wire specification?

Limits of Specifications

There is only so much information that can be gathered from wire specifications. The reason for this is most wire specifications set a minimum performance level. As seen in the following figure, although the product from some companies perform significantly better than others, they are grouped together and sold under the same standard.

EWIS Components

If a wire standard requires passing a 1000 cycle scrape abrasion test, how does that help with defining a life limit in your operational environment? Although it does provide a starting point for comparative analysis, it will unlikely help to define an estimated service life. In some cases, it may be necessary to perform an analysis of the component.

Define the scope

There are more than 60 tests outlined in the AS4373 standard. These cover electrical, mechanical, chemical, quality assessment, and thermal endurance of completed wire constructions. To assess each possible combination of tests would take a large budget and a lot of patience.

In Lectromec’s experience the wire and cable longevity comes down to determining the electrical, physical, and/or functional End Of Life (EOL). The following is a summary of each consideration:

The more typical of these is E#1 and M#2. Lectromec recommends not trying to solve all possible combinations of component degradation, but focus on the particular application(s) that are causing the problem(s).

The obvious benefits of this are that the test matrix is dramatically reduced leading to a faster result combined with a lower cost.

Electrical Limits

In a March 2014 blog called High Voltage Testing Considerations, we talked about high voltage testing of wires as they near EOL. The same consideration should be made for the test configurations where EOL determination is necessary.

For those who did not read it, this simply stated, if you have a 28VDC system and an insulation breach is found with a dielectric test performed at 1500VAC, how much cable service life was lost due to the high voltage? For many applications, Lectromec argued that finding a breach in such a way (and potentially creating the breach with the voltage) during a routine EWIS inspection is worth the risk – better to find it on the ground during routine inspections than an in-service failure.

But what if your application is unrecoverable or not easily replaceable? In these cases, determining the voltage end of life condition should use a voltage closer to the expected maximum application voltage. Doing so is likely to provide a better estimate of EOL conditions.

Mechanical Limits

When considering the mechanical stresses, consider the following types of mechanical stresses:

EWIS Components

In Lab Testing

When testing for EOL, unless the environment is extremely severe, it is recommended that accelerated aging techniques be applied. Waiting for 10k hours to determine if a component will last 10k hours is often not feasible from a project or financial viewpoint, testing is often performed at elevated temperatures. For example, if the objective is to determine component EOL at 200oC, testing performed at 220 or 240oC will expedite the time to failure.

Multiple higher stress configurations are necessary to determine the impact on component life. Care has to be taken to ensure that the conditions used are not so severe that they are beyond the accepted materials limits. In such cases the material may begin to experience degradation mechanisms that are entirely unlikely to happen in an actual service environment.

Once the conditions have been selected, then comes selecting the sample size. In the above figure, a large number of data points were gathered for this configuration with different environmental stress levels. There are two important takeaways from the above figure: 1) If testing were only performed at the highest couple of stress levels, then a much shorter service life would have been predicted (Life prediction #1), and 2) the least severe condition was still above the estimated in-service stress level, but provided a starting point for setting a service life limit on the component (life prediction #2).

In Application

Defining a component service is not as simple as throwing the item into a high stress test setup and gathering the results. Planning and proper consideration is necessary to get valuable, applicable results for your application.

Michael Traskos
Michael Traskos
President, Lectromec

Michael has been involved in wire degradation and failure assessments for more than a decade. He has worked on dozens of projects assessing the reliability and qualification of EWIS components. In September 2014, Michael was appointed as an FAA DER with a delegated authority covering EWIS certification.